Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Nav-Tv, Corp. v. Audionics System, Inc. d/b/a Crux Interfacing Solutions, No. 2:15-cv-01467 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01467, Dkt. No. 66
Decided
August 3, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of NAV -TV, Corp. (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. No. 56, filed on June 27, 2016), 1 the response of Audionics System, Inc. d/b/a Crux Interfacing Solutions (“Defendant”) (Dkt. No. 58, filed on July 11, 2016), and the reply of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 59, filed on July 18, 2016). The Court held a hearing on the issues of claim construction and claim definiteness on July 28, 2016. Having considered the arguments and evidence presented by the parties at the hearing and in their briefing, the Court issues this Order.