Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Huang et al v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 2:15-cv-01413 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2017)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01413, Dkt. No. 204
Decided
March 27, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: 179 Opposed MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Mr. Xiaohua Huang, acting pro se, sued Huawei Technologies Co., LTD. (Huawei) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,744,653, 6,999,331, and RE45,259, which are generally related to circuits for content addressable memory (CAM). After the Court granted summary judgment of noninfringement and entered final judgment, Huawei moved for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and under the Court’s inherent power. See Huawei Br., ECF No. 179. For the following reasons, Huawei’s motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Mr. Huang owns CMOS Micro Device, Inc.