Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01367 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On June 30, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 5,987,434 (“the ’434 Patent”); 6,999,938 (“the ’938 Patent”); 8,234,184 (“the ’184 Patent ”); 7,890,366 (“the ’366 Pa tent”); 7,860,744 (“the ’744 Patent”); 8,606,632 (“the ’632 Patent ”); 8,352,317 (“the ’317 Pa tent”); 8,738,435 (“the ’435 Patent”); and 7,856,375 (“the ’ 375 Patent”) (collectively, th e “Asserted Patents”).