Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Blitzsafe Texas, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01278 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01278, Dkt. No. 28
Decided
September 13, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC, 27 Report and Recommendations,
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Magistrate Judge’s Report recommended that Defendants Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Blitzsafe Texas, LLC’s First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim. (Dkt. No. 24 (2:15-cv-1278)) be DENIED. The Magistrate Judge’s Report found that the complaint stated a plausible claim for relief under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court in Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).