Perdiem Co LLC v. GPS Logic, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-01216 (E.D. Tex. July 27, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On April 21, 2016, the Court held a hearing in PerDiem Co. LLC v. IndusTrack LLC, et al., No. 2:15-CV-727 (“IndusTrack” or “Industrack”), to determine the proper construction of disputed claim terms in United States Patents No. 8,223,012, 8,493,207, 8,717,166, 9,003,499, and 9,071,931. In the above -captioned case, the parties have agreed that no claim construction hearing is necessary and that the parties’ disputes can be addressed based upon the briefing, without oral argument. See (Dkt. No. 87).