Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. v. Zenner Performance Meters, Inc. d/b/a Zenner USA, No. 2:15-cv-01155 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01155, Dkt. No. 33
Decided
January 13, 2016
Judge
William C. Bryson, J.
Document
Order
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant Zenner Performance Meters, Inc., (“Zenner”) to strike the response to Zenner’s motion to dism iss filed by plaintiff E ndeavor Meshtech, Inc. (“Endeavor”) (Dkt. No. 29). The motion is DENIED. 1. Zenner contends that Endeavor’s res ponse to Zenner’s motion to dismiss exceeded the 30-page limit set forth in th is court’s local rules for dispositive motions and responses to those motions. Local Rule CV-7(a)(1).