Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Morpho Komodo LLC v. BLU Products INc., No. 2:15-cv-01100 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01100, Dkt. No. 165
Decided
July 25, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
43 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On May 18, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 7,350,078 (“the ’078 Patent”), 7,725,725 (“the ’725 Patent”), and 8,429,415 (“the ’415 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). After considering the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence presented by the parties at the hearing and in the briefing (Dkt. Nos. 136, 142, and 143), the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm.