Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Script Security Solutions, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01030 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01030, Dkt. No. 173
Decided
July 22, 2016
Judge
William C. Bryson, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On June 23, 2016, the Court held a hearing to address the proper construction of the disputed terms of the three pate nts at issue in this case, U. S. Patent Nos. 6,542,078 (“the ’078 patent”), 6,828,909 (“the ’909 patent”), and 7,113, 091 (“the ’091 patent”). After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearin g and in their claim c onstruction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 134, 137, and 138), the Court issues this orde r setting forth the Court’s construction of the claim terms identified by the parties.