Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. v. UCB, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01001 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01001, Dkt. No. 70
Decided
July 11, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. No. 46, filed on April 12, 2016), 1 the response of UCB, Inc. (“Defendant”) (Dkt. No. 49, filed on April 26, 2016), and the reply of Plaintiff ( Dkt. No. 51, filed on May 4, 2016). The Court held a hearing on the issues of claim construction and claim definiteness on May 25, 2016.