Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00621 (E.D. Tex. June 17, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On April 19, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed terms in five Asserted Patents. The Court has considered the briefs and arguments . (Dkt. Nos. 106, 110, and 111.) Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).