Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Porto Technology Co., Ltd v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00457 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00457, Dkt. No. 110
Decided
March 11, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court, on March 10, 2016, held a hearing to address Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404. (Dkt. No. 29.) Apple asserts this case should be transferred to the Northern District of California . Plaintiff Porto Technology Co., Lt d. opposes transfer. The Court having considered the facts and arguments finds that transfer is warranted in this case.