Orostream LLC v. Abs-Cbn International, No. 2:15-cv-00248 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are multiple Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss under § 101 in Case No. 2:15-cv-248. (Dkt. Nos. 34, 42.) On August 31, 2015, the Court converted both of these motions to Rule 56 Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 152.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions under Rule 56 and fi nds that the challenged claim of the patent-in-suit is ineligible for patent protection on the ground that it is di rected to unpatentable subject matter.