Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al, No. 2:15-cv-00225 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On October 26, 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed terms in nine Asserted Patents. The Court, having considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 56, 60, and 64) and their arguments at the hearing, issues this Memorandum Opinion and Order construing the disputed terms. BACKGROUND AND THE ASSERTED PATENTS Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC (“PUMA ”) brought this action against ZTE Corp., ZTE USA, Inc., and ZTE (TX), Inc.