Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Elbit Systems Land and C4I Ltd. et al v. Hughes Network Systems, LLC et al, No. 2:15-cv-00037 (E.D. Tex. June 20, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00037, Dkt. No. 388
Decided
June 20, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 314 Opposed SEALED MOTION to Exclude the Opinions Offered by Christopher Martinez filed by Hughes Network Systems, LLC, 292 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Clai…
Length
45 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Expert Opinions Regarding Stricken Prior Art References And Undisclosed Invalidity Theories (Dkt. 275) (“Elbit’s Motion to Strike Invalidity Opinions”). (2) Defendant Hughes Network Systems, LLC’s Motion to Strike Elbit’s ’874 Patent Infringement Contentions ( Dkt. 276) (“Hugh es’ Motion to Strike Infringement Contentions”). (3) Defendant Hughes’s Motion to Exclude Elbit’s New Priority Date Contentions for the ’073 Patent (Dkt. 277) (“Hughes’ Priority Date Motion”).