Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ericsson Inc. et al v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd. et al, No. 2:15-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 4, 2017)

Granted in Part
Motion to Strike Daubert / Expert Challenges Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00011, Dkt. No. 359
Decided
November 4, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 217, 300 motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 220 motion to strike; denying 222 motion to strike; denying 292 request for additional claim construction; denying 299 motion for summary judgment; fin…
Length
35 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Trial in this case is scheduled to begin December 4, 2017. The following opinion and order resolves the parties’ pending motions, with the exception of motions in limine , which will be addressed at the pretrial conference. BACKGROUND The parties to the lawsuit are global networking and telecommunications equipment and services companies. The two plaintiffs are companies based in the United States and Sweden. Ericsson is a Delaware corporation based in Plano, Texas. Compl. ¶ 1, Dkt. No. 1. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is based in Stockholm, Sweden.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case