Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Quad Powerline Technologies LLC v. Trendnet, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-01169 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-01169, Dkt. No. 21
Decided
August 17, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant TRENDnet, Inc. ’s (“TRENDnet”) Motion to Tra nsfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 15). TRENDnet contends that this case should be transferred to the Central District of California , which it asserts is a clearly more convenient venue. Plaintiff Quad Powerline Technologies LLC (“QPT”) opposes transfer. After considering the evidence and weighing the factors the Court finds that transfer is not warranted.