Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freeny et al v. Aruba Networks, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-01031 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-01031, Dkt. No. 108
Decided
September 29, 2015
Judge
William C. Bryson, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this consolidated action, the plainti ffs and the only remaining defendant ADTRAN, Inc., have submitted for the Court’s consideration their views as to the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 7,110,744 (“the ’744 patent”), owned jointly by the plaintiffs. After considering the arguments made by the parties in their claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos.