Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Traxxas LP v. HobbyKing Corp. d/b/a HobbyKing and HobbyKing.com et al, No. 2:14-cv-01005 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-01005, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
August 28, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On August 4, 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in n United States Patent Nos. 7,374,460 (“the ’460 Patent”), 7,530,855 (“the ’855 Patent”), and 7,867,038 (“the ’038 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 46, 47, and 49), the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.