Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00902 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On August 31, 2015 the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed terms in nine Asserted Patents. Th e Court, having considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 78, 86, 88) and th eir arguments at the he aring, issues this Memorandum Opinion and Order construing the disputed terms. BACKGROUND AND THE ASSERTED PATENTS Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LL C (“PUMA”) brings three actions: one against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.