Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Brite Smart Corp. v. Google Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00760 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2015)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00760, Dkt. No. 154
Decided
August 3, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Google Inc.’s (“Google”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404( a) (Dkt. No. 18). Google argues that this case should be transferred to the Northern District of California. Plaintiff Brite Smart Corp. (“Brite Smart”) opposes transfer. After considering all the evidence and weighing all the factors the Court finds that Google has shown that transfer is warranted.