Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allergan, Inc. v. Actavis plc et al, No. 2:14-cv-00638 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00638, Dkt. No. 97
Decided
December 23, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ (Actavis PLC, Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories , Inc. and Actavis Pharma, Inc., collectively, “Defendants”) Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Pe rsonal Jurisdiction (-188 Case, Dkt. No. 24 ; -638 Case, Dkt. No. 35) and Plaintiff Allergan, Inc.’s Motions for Summary Judgment on Count I and Motions to Dismiss Count II (-188 Case, Dkt. No. 35; -638 Case Dkt. No. 14) .