Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Horizon Therapeutics Inc v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc, No. 2:14-cv-00384 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00384, Dkt. No. 129
Decided
October 20, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) seeking the FDA’s approval to market a generic version of Plaintiff Horizon Therapeutics, Inc.’s drug Ravicti. Par’s ANDA filing gave rise to this patent infringement dispute. On August 12, 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of nine disputed terms in two asserted patents: U.S. Patent No. 8,404,215 (“the ’215 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 8,642,012 (“the ’012 patent”).