Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Telinit Technologies, LLC v. Alteva, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00369 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00369, Dkt. No. 97
Decided
March 3, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Denying 89 SEALED MOTION for Declaration of Exceptional Case and Award of Attorney's Fees filed by Jive Communications, Inc
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Jive Communica tions, Inc.’s (“Jive”) Motion for Declaration of Exceptional Case and Award of Attorneys’ Fees (Docket No. 89). Having reviewed the parties’ arguments and for the reasons stated below, Jive’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is DENIED. BACKGROUND On April 29, 2014, Plaintiff Telinit Technologies , LLC (“Telinit”) filed this action alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Number 6,192,123 (“the ’123 Patent”) against Jive. On February 20, 2015, Jive filed a motion for judgment on the pleadi ngs (Docket No.