Better Mouse Company, LLC v. Steelseries ApS et al, No. 2:14-cv-00198 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 9, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant SteelSe ries’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Plaintiff’s Damages Expert Just in Blok Pursuant to Federal Ru le of Evidence 702. (Dkt. No. 228.) SteelSeries raises four argum ents in its Motion. First, Steel Series asserts that Mr. Blok’s testimony is not admissible under Federal Circu it precedent because he “makes no meaningful attempt to apportion the royalty base.” (Dkt. No. 309 at 4.) Sec ond, SteelSeries claims that Mr.