Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Abstrax, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, No. 2:14-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 165
Decided
January 12, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
34 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Plaintiff Abstrax, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. No. 80, filed on October 23 , 2014), the response of Defendant Hewlett- Packard Company (“Defendant”) (Dkt. No. 92, filed on November 11 , 2014) , the reply of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 107, filed on November 20, 2014), and the sur -reply of Defendant (Dkt. No. 115-5, filed on November 26, 201 4). The Court held a claim construction hearing on December 3, 2014 .