Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC et al, No. 2:14-cv-00106 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00106, Dkt. No. 35
Decided
March 31, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue Pursua nt to § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 22). The Plaintiff, Innova tive Display Technologies, LLC , opposes the motion. Having considered the motion, the parties briefing, and all of the evidence in the record, in light of the applicable law, the Court DENIES the motion for the reasons set forth below. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Innovative Display Tec hnologies, LLC (“IDT”) is a corporation based in Plano, Texas and the owner of U.S. Patent Nos.