Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc., et al, No. 2:14-cv-00059 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00059, Dkt. No. 184
Decided
December 19, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 172 MOTION To Lift Stay 173 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice C-Cation's Complaint
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

, AND RECOMMENDATION C-Cation filed this lawsuit on February 4, 2014, accusing the defendants of infringing claims 1, 3, and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,563,883. This lawsuit and several others filed by C-Cation prompted defendants and other entities to petition the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for inter partes review (IPR) of the ’883 patent. The PTAB has since found claims 1, 3, and 4 of the ’883 patent to be unpatentable, and the Federal Circuit has affirmed the PTAB’s decision. See C- Cation Techs., LLC v. Arris Grp., Inc., 695 F. App’x 574 (Fed.