Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Panagene, Inc v Bio-Synthesis, Inc, No. 2:14-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2015)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00034, Dkt. No. 51
Decided
March 30, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Motion to Dismiss filed by Bio-Synthesis, Inc., 47 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Currently before the Court is the Report a nd Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on March 11, 2015 (Dkt. No. 47) recommending de nial of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted (Dkt. No. 7). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set fort h in the Court’s Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 7) is DENIED.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case