Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Industrial Print Technologies LLC v. Canon U.S.A., Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00019 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2014)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00019, Dkt. No. 60
Decided
December 19, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., (“C -USA”) and Canon Solutions America, Inc.’s (“CSA”) (collectively, the “Canon entities”) Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 36). The Plaintiff , Industrial Print Technologies LLC (“IPT”), opposes the M otion. For the reasons set forth below, the Canon entities’ Motion to Transfer Venue is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Industrial Print Technologies is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas. Dkt. No. 23 at ¶ 1 (Pl.’s Am. Compl.). IPT owns the rights to U.S. Patent No.