Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC et al v. Apple Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00015 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 1, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00015, Dkt. No. 51
Decided
August 1, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***VACATED AND WITHDRAWN PER ORDER # 59***MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 22), filed March 2 2, 2014. Apple asks the Court to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (NDCA). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the motion should be DENIED. Plaintiffs Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC and Rembrandt Secure Computing, LLC (collectively “Rembrandt”) filed this suit for patent infringement on Ja nuary 10, 2014 (Dkt. No. 1). The lone patent in suit, U.S. Patent No.