Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. General Motors Company, No. 2:13-cv-01093 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01093, Dkt. No. 26
Decided
March 30, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Denying 18 Motion to Transfer Venue
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is General Motor s, LLC (“ GM”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the Eastern District of Michigan ( Dkt. No. 18, filed April 29, 2014, “Motion to Transfer” ). In its Motion to Transfer, GM argues that the Eastern District of Michigan is a clearly more convenient forum for this case. Plaintiffs Phoenix Licensing, LLC and LPL (collectively, “Phoenix”) oppose transfer.