Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

e-Watch Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01061 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01061, Dkt. No. 334
Decided
March 25, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
69 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On January 16, 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 7,365,871 (“the ‘871 Patent”) and 7,643,168 (“the ‘168 Patent”) (collectively “the A sserted Patents”). After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 216, 224, and 231), the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. Page 2 of 69 TABLE OF CONTENTS I.