Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Biscotti Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2:13-cv-01015 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01015, Dkt. No. 120
Decided
November 9, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
47 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On October 11, 2016, the Court held an oral he aring to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 8,144,182 (t he “’182 Patent”). The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 103, 107 and 108) and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, th e Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp. , 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).