Cardsoft, Inc. et al v. Hypercom Corporation et al, No. 2:13-cv-00941 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for a Permanent Injunction Under 35 U.S.C. § 283 or, in the Alternative, Imposition of an Ongoing Royalty (Dkt. No. 429). PERMANENT INJUNCTION CardSoft requests that the Court issue a permanent injunction against on-going infringement by Defendants VeriFone and Hype rcom. In determining whether to issue a permanent injunction in patent cases, courts apply the four factor test provided for in eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, 547 U.S. 388, 394 (2006).