Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation, No. 2:13-cv-00936 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Starbucks Corporation ’s (“Starbucks”) Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 14). Starbucks contends that the Western District of Washington is a clearly more convenient forum for this case than the Eastern District of Texas. Plaintiff Kroy IP Holdings, LLC (“Kroy”) opposes transfer. Having considered the Motion and all of the evidence in the record, the Court DENIES Starbucks’ motion. II.