Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00909 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2015)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00909, Dkt. No. 200
Decided
January 6, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants Kyocera Communications, Inc.’s (“Kyocera”) Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 181), which is joined by Defendants Panasonic Corporation of North America (“Panasonic”) (Dkt. No. 183), Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) (Dkt. No. 186), Huawei Device USA Inc. and Futurewei Te chnologies, Inc. (“Huawei entities”) (Dkt. No. 188), Sharp Electronics Corporation (“Sharp”) (Dkt. No. 189), and LG Electronics USA, Inc. (Dkt. No 190), in addition to NEC Corporation of America’s (“NEC”) Motion to Stay (Dkt. No.