Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SecureNova, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:13-cv-00905 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2014)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00905, Dkt. No. 26
Decided
September 30, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 Report and Recommendations. 12 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Currently before the Court is the Repo rt and Recommendation signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Payne on September 19, 2014 (Dkt. No. 23) recommending that LG’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 12) be denied. The Court has considered the objections f iled by Defendant. LG first argues that Magistrate Judge Payne erred because he “does not address . . . LG’s request that the Court dismiss SecureNova’s willful infringement claim.” (Obj.