Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc, No. 2:13-cv-00893 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2014)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00893, Dkt. No. 285
Decided
November 18, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Google’s “O bjections to the Magistrate’s Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Google’s Motion to Transfer Venue” (“Objections”) (Dkt. No. 188). In the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Opin ion and Order Denying Google’s Motion to Transfer Venue (“Memorandum Opinion”) (Dkt. No. 165), the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying Google’s Motion to Transfer Venue (D kt. No. 18).