Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Leap Wireless International, Inc. et al, No. 2:13-cv-00885 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00885, Dkt. No. 194
Decided
September 23, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc.’s (collectively, Leap) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Regarding U.S. Patent No. 5,659,891 (the ’891 patent). (Doc. No. 60.) Leap contends that the ’891 patent is directed to an “abstract idea.” Plaintiff Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC (MTel) contends that the patent is directed to a concrete invention .