Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ComCam International, Inc. v. Mobotix Corp., No. 2:13-cv-00798 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00798, Dkt. No. 28
Decided
August 26, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Mobotix’s Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 20), filed April 4, 2014. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff ComCam International (“ComCam”) is a Delaware company with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania. It is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,975,220 (“the ’220 Patent”). Defendant Mobotix is a foreign corporation with its U.S. headquarters in New York, New York.