Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 2:13-cv-00783 (E.D. Tex. June 17, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00783, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
June 17, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Microsoft Corporation’ s (“Microsoft”) Motion to Dismiss or to Transfer (Dkt. No. 16) and Opposed Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 33.) The latter motion, though directed at Plaintiff’s Ame nded Complaint, substantially overlaps with the earlier motion.1 As such, the Court deems it proper to address both motions together. On May 16, 2014, the Court held a hearing on Microsoft’s motions.