Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Star Co LED Technologies, LLC v. Sharp Corporation et al, No. 2:13-cv-00416 (E.D. Tex. May 15, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00416, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
May 15, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation (“Sharp”) and Sony Electro nics, Inc.’s (“Sony”) Motion to Sever and to Stay Plaintiff’s Claims Against Defendant Videoland , LLC (“Videoland”) (“Defendants’ Motion”) (Dkt. No. 34 ) 1. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants’ Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Star Co LED Technologies, LLC (“Plaintiff”) sued Sharp, Sony and Videoland (collectively, “Defendants”) on May 17, 2013. (Dkt.