InvenSense, Inc. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00405 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s (“STI”) Motion To Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, To Transfer (Dkt . No. 19), filed July 17, 2013. Defendants argue, first, that venue is improper in the Eastern District of Texas and the case should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(3); and, in the alternative, they argue that the Court should transfer t his case to the Northern District of California for the convenience of the parties and witnesses under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).