Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mears Technologies, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, No. 2:13-cv-00376 (E.D. Tex. June 17, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00376, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
June 17, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the parties’ claim construction briefing. Five disputed terms are presented b y the parties for construction. This Order addresses the parties’ various claim construction disputes. The Order will f irst briefly address the single patent-in-suit and then turn to the merits of the claim construction issues. I. BACKGROUND AND THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT Plaintiff Mears Technologies, Inc. (“Mears”) brings this action against Defendant Finisar Corporation (“Finisar”) alleging infringe ment of U.S. Pat. No. 6,141,361 (the “ ’361 Patent”).