Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freeny et al v Vizio Inc, No. 2:13-cv-00370 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 4, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00370, Dkt. No. 28
Decided
December 4, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Vizio, Inc.’s Contested Motion for Bill of Costs Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). Case No. 2:13-cv-361 Docket No. 133. The motion is DENIED. After some discovery had taken place, but before dispositive motions were filed in this case, the plaintiffs dismissed their claims against defendant Vizio with prejudice. The dismissal with prejudice rendered Vizio the prevailing party in the lawsuit. See Schwartz v. Folloder, 767 F.2d 125, 131 (5th Cir.