Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cardsoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC v. First Data Corporation, No. 2:13-cv-00290 (E.D. Tex. May 29, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00290, Dkt. No. 148
Decided
May 29, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On June 10, 2014, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Pa tents No. 6,934,945 (“the ’945 Patent”) and 7,302,683 (“the ’683 Patent”). The Court entered a Cl aim Construction Memorandum and Order on June 24, 2014 (“First Data Markman”). Dkt. No. 82. Previously, the Court construed the term “v irtual machine” (among other terms) in the same patents-in-suit in CardSoft (Assignment for the Benefi t of Creditors) LLC, et al. v. VeriFone Systems, Inc., et al. , No. 2:08-CV-98, Dkt. No.