Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GeoTag Inc v. The Boeing Co, No. 2:13-cv-00183 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2013)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00183, Dkt. No. 22
Decided
November 7, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patent-in-suit. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the def…
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two categories of clai m terms for construction: 1) terms argued by the parties in their supplemental briefing and at the September 17, 2013 claim construction hearing (addressed in section B, below); and 2) terms that were not addressed in either the supplemental briefing or at the hearing, which were only argued in the parties original briefing. (Compare Dkt. Nos. 597 & 600 with Dkt. Nos. 501, 508, 512 & 601).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error