Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tierra Intelectual Borinquen, Inc. v. Toshiba Corporation et al, No. 2:13-cv-00047 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00047, Dkt. No. 31
Decided
February 14, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts I-IV and VI of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 15), filed May 17, 2013. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that Defendants’ Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“the Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 14) alleges that Defendants directly and indirectly infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,350,078 (“the ‘078 Patent), 7,725,725 (“the ‘725 Patent”), and 8,429,415 (“the ‘415 Patent”).