Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Keranos, LLC v. Silicon Storage Technology, Inc., et al, No. 2:13-cv-00017 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00017, Dkt. No. 227
Decided
January 3, 2014
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re reasoning behind court's constructions
Length
35 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On December 12, 2012, the Court held a hear ing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Pa tent No. 4,795,719, U.S. Patent No. 4,868,629, and U.S. Patent No. 5,042,009. On January 8, 2013, the Court entered a Pr ovisional Opinion and Order providing the Court’s constructions.