Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personal Audio, LLC v. Togi Entertainment, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00013 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 5, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00013, Dkt. No. 301
Decided
September 5, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 188 Sealed Motion
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike Potions of the Rebuttal Expert Reports of Dr. Kevin C. Almeroth and Mr. David Leathers That Relate to Secondary Considerations of Non-obviousness (Dkt. No. 188, filed June 26, 2014). APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the tr ier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) t…